Comments on: Andre Agassi ( Part 1 ) 60 minutes Exclusive interview! Hating tennis, using meth / November 8 2009

By: popnfresh93

popnfresh93 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:54:42 +0000

who cares if he took drugs… he was still a great player and without him and sampras tennis wouldnt be as popular

By: Natmaniac

Natmaniac — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:54:52 +0000

PLEASE – Cyrstal meth a performance enhancing drug?GET REAL. Thats like saying being drunk on court is an advantage.

Shld he have taken it? Who knows who cares i have not walked a mile in his shoes so i cant comment, bottom line is he WAS and IS a great tennis player who managed to live an extraordinary life.

BEFORE you comment ask your self the question… what have you achieved? And who have you helped apart from yourself in the last year

You and no one are perfect – reflect and move on

By: AdvertChild98

AdvertChild98 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:03:47 +0000

As a sportman, he took drug? What a disgrace! Whether or not the drug will enhance his ability, it won’t change the fact that he’s a junkie. I can’t believe his delusional fans try to justify this behaviour.

Why not tell your children or grandchildren it’s OKAY to take Crystal Meth. What a bunch of fools.

And don’t put Sampras in the same sentence as Agassi. The former is a TRUE legend, a true honorable man, a true SPORTSMAN. The latter.. well need i say more? lol.

By: saviom01

saviom01 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:52:11 +0000

Omg. He never did charity work before he was famous? Advert child, seriously? One could work in a soup kitchen, or maybe volunteer, but CHARITY work is generally created and done by celebrities. Are you dense? And you obviously are completely uneducated of the syntax and definition of the word junkie. It is impossible to be a junkie and not have it show in ones face. You can see just above us in the video, he is not a junkie. But, have fun arguing anyway.

By: popnfresh93

popnfresh93 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:20:50 +0000

michael phelps smoked a bong LOL should he be stripped of his gold medals?

By: AdvertChild98

AdvertChild98 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:17:38 +0000

What a brainless argument. The difference is Phelps didn’t take drug before and during the Olympic. so his medals stay with him. Besides, he already apologized and got suspended after getting caught. Unlike Agassi, he took the punishment like a man and never denied his actions.

By: AdvertChild98

AdvertChild98 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:55:17 +0000

If Agassi got suspended as he should had in 1997, do you really think he would have the same career afterward that he would have now? I doubt it. Many players make an absence from the tour for 1 or 2 years and never manage to crack up top 10 again. I doubt Agassi would make any difference. If he feels sorry for what he did, he should’ve returned all the trophies that he won after 1997. Plain and Simple.

lol I can’t believe someone tries to compare Phelps with Agassi.

By: AdvertChild98

AdvertChild98 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:02:30 +0000

lol, only celebrities can do charity work? You are dumber than i thought. In addition, you failed to answer “Did Agassi truly have done charity work before he got famous or not?” So your argument is useless.

lol you think someone who took drug will have a sign sticking on his forehand saying “I took drug”? Don’t be ridiculous, you can’t tell someone by judging his face shown on the interviews.
He was a junkie at the time Whether you fanbots admit it or not.

By: popnfresh93

popnfresh93 — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:32:23 +0000

the only reason phelps admitted to smoking the bong was cause of the photo ==” do u think he would have told the whole world if there was no photo?

By: AdvertChild98

AdvertChild98 — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:50:35 +0000

I should be asking you “why are you dragging Phelps into this discussion.” As I pointed out, Phelps’ situation is different from Agassi’s.